🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location protests can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the hard-won right to public demonstration.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at mass killing, you likely can't draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, a statement that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and direct action against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as systematic destruction. Its warfare have led the global justice body to release arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on weapons exports to the state, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Ministers have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as dangerous radicals. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately questioned for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have taken many thousands of lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a dangerous threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Thousands of British protesters have been detained, primarily for carrying signs opposing mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the sitting leader characterized such protests as antisemitic. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.