🔗 Share this article

"A significant portion of my life is archived on this app, and suddenly they demand us to fork out money for it."

One-star reviews and a sense of inequity have flooded digital forums since the messaging service became the latest tech firm to start charging for a service that users previously accessed for without payment.

The app's parent company declared in the fall that it would require payment from subscribers if they have over five GB of saved pictures and clips stored as Snapchat Memories.

For many, these old snaps serve as a portal to bygone days – leading some to criticize the firm of "money-hungry tactics" in messages on online platforms and unfavorable ratings on mobile app marketplaces.

Alternative Options

Snap has equated its paid storage plans to those provided by Apple and Google for mobile devices.

As another possibility for individuals avoiding fees, subscribers can download their archived media – which for certain users cover tens of gigabytes – to their own hardware.

The firm mentioned that only a minority of subscribers would be impacted by the changes.

The company admitted that it was "never easy to move from accessing content at no charge to covering the expense" – but suggested it would be "worth the cost" for subscribers.

A significant number of opposing the decision via digital channels seem to disagree.

User Backlash

An online petition labeled the charge a "archival levy", with commenters labeling it "Orwellian" and "outrageous" – while a user threatened never to use the app in the future.

In parallel, in a poor rating on the app marketplace, a person identifying as a pseudonymous user said it felt "deeply unfair".

"If I know millennials right, the majority have years worth of recorded experiences on this service," they commented. "The vast majority only continued using Snapchat primarily for that feature. 5GB is absolutely nothing when you have years worth of moments... Farewell Snapchat."

Furthermore, Guste Ven, a young adult aspiring reporter in the UK capital, shared on the video platform her plans to delete the application.

"I made up my mind that I wanted to export all my memories as immediately," she explained. "The vast majority of my youth have been recorded through my saved snaps, all of the images in there are really important to me."

"The decision appears unreasonable to demand payment users for a feature that has been free for a considerable period."

Unknown Fees

The company has yet to announce how much subscription tiers would require in the UK – only that they are part of a "phased international launch".

Yet 23-year-old Amber Daley, who also lives in the capital, commented in a post on the video service that she would be "distraught" by such charges.

Amber mentioned that the app had become "a part of everyday life" since she started using it in 2014.

Although she acknowledged she accepted the service needed to earn income, Amber proposed that the archival function is more valuable than the corporation may have anticipated.

"I think it's a rather unjust move to demand payment from your subscribers who have been faithful and dedicated," she said. "These are not merely labeled 'Memories', these are our genuine personal moments."

Expert Analysis

Companies opting to impose fees from users for a function that was earlier without cost is nothing new, and numerous people cover the cost of platforms like digital backup services to backup their media content from their handset.

The fact of archiving content in the online servers – which some in the digital field like to refer to as simply "somebody else's computer" – is that it involves expenses.

"Hosting vast amounts of archived media on the service demands considerable investment," social media consultant a tech commentator explained. "Snapchat has to try to find a way to fund the operation of archiving, network usage, back-ups, file sharing, security measures – everything involved."

However the consultant indicated that imposing charges for a service that had earlier required no payment, and users had been invited to access as such, may appear as a "bait and switch" for certain individuals.

"Moving the goalposts after individuals have accumulated this massive online collection doesn't really sit right," he noted. For numerous users, he continued, "Saved content is more than stored files, they're personal mementos."

The opinion was shared by those leaving critical reviews, with one person describing their saved images and clips "the most precious thing to me".

"These archives contain every aspect of my personal journey within them from happy occasions such as new additions, sad moments of loss, times spent with loved ones, [and] my entire youth," they commented.

Research Perspective

An academic expert, a postdoctoral researcher at an educational establishment in the Netherlands, explained that Snapchat's move shows the ramifications of for-profit services being used to save emotional private media.

"Platforms gain from this confidence, interdependence, and presumption of never-ending access, which even encourages some users to continue using the app or persist with the feature in order to review their saved content," she informed the BBC. "Yet these are not charitable custodians of private remembrance."