Pressure, Anxiety and Optimism as India's financial capital Slum Dwellers Await the Bulldozers
Over an extended period, intimidating messages persisted. Originally, supposedly from a retired cop and a retired army general, and then from law enforcement directly. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was summoned to the police station and instructed bluntly: stop speaking out or face serious consequences.
This third-generation resident is one of many resisting a high-value project where one of India's largest slums – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be razed and transformed by a corporate giant.
"The distinctive community of the slum is like nowhere else in the world," says Shaikh. "Yet they want to destroy our community and prevent our protests."
Contrasting Realities
The narrow alleys of the slum stand in sharp opposition to the high-rise structures and elite residences that overshadow the neighborhood. Homes are built haphazardly and frequently without proper sanitation, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the air is permeated by the overpowering odor of open sewers.
Among some individuals, the prospect of the slum's redevelopment into a developed area of luxury high-rises, well-maintained green spaces, contemporary malls and homes with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream come true.
"We lack proper healthcare, proper streets or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," says a tea vendor, 56, who moved from southern India in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to clear the area and provide modern residences."
Resident Opposition
However, some, like the leather artisan, are resisting the redevelopment.
All recognize that Dharavi, historically ignored as informal housing, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. Yet they are concerned that this project – lacking public consultation – is one that will convert valuable urban land into an elite enclave, displacing the disadvantaged, working-class residents who have lived there since the nineteenth century.
These were these excluded, relocated individuals who established the empty marshland into a widely studied marvel of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose economic value is valued at between a significant amount and a substantial sum annually, making it a major unregulated sectors.
Displacement Concerns
Of the roughly 1 million people living in the crowded sprawling neighborhood, fewer than half will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take an extended timeframe to complete. Others will be relocated to barren areas and saline fields on the distant periphery of Mumbai, risking fragment a long-established community. Certain individuals will not get residences at all.
People eligible to remain in Dharavi will be given units in tower blocks, a substantial change from the organic, collective approach of residing and operating that has supported this area for so long.
Businesses from clothing production to ceramic crafts and recycling are projected to decrease in quantity and be moved to an allocated "business area" far from residential areas.
Survival Challenge
In the case of the leather artisan, a craftsman and multi-generational resident to reside in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-floor facility creates leather coats – sharp blazers, premium outerwear, decorated jackets – sold in luxury boutiques in the city's affluent areas and overseas.
Household members dwells in the spaces underneath and his workers and tailors – migrants from different regions – reside there, permitting him to manage costs. Away from the slum, Mumbai rents are often 10 times costlier for minimal space.
Pressure and Coercion
In the government offices in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the redevelopment plan depicts a very different perspective. Well-groomed residents move around on bicycles and electric vehicles, buying continental baked goods and pastries and having coffee on a patio adjacent to a coffee shop and treat station. It is a complete departure from the 20-rupee idli sambar breakfast and budget beverage that maintains local residents.
"This isn't progress for us," says Shaikh. "It represents a huge property transaction that will price people out for our community to continue."
Additionally, there exists distrust of the development company. Run by an influential industrialist – one of India's most powerful and a close ally of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.
Even as the state government labels it a collaborative effort, the corporation paid nearly a billion dollars for its 80% stake. A case alleging that the initiative was improperly granted to the developer is being considered in India's supreme court.
Continued Intimidation
Since they began to actively protest the redevelopment, local opponents assert they have been experienced an extended period of harassment and intimidation – comprising communications, clear intimidation and insinuations that speaking against the project was comparable with speaking against the country – by individuals they claim work for the developer.
Included in these accused of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c