🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed decision, the highest judicial body has allowed Texas to use a revised congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five new GOP-friendly districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's injunction that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The lower court improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, creating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

That lower court had previously found that Texas had probably classified voters according to their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to use the boundaries established after the 2020 census for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Opposition

With a strongly worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the majority's decision. She stated that it disrespected the work of the district court, pointing out that its decision was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan stated in a dissent supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, This court's stay ensures that Texas's new map, with all its enhanced favoritism, will govern next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be grouped in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Struggle

The ruling occurs during a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in pushes to transform the U.S. House map to secure a narrow Republican control. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a decennial population count. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also passed redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, meanwhile, have responded with their own plans in states like California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those potential gains.

Partisan Reactions

The Texas AG hailed the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that secures electoral outcomes favorable to his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, opposition party representatives lamented the ruling. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the chair of a major Democratic election organization.

A leading House leader argued the court had yet again shredded its credibility by upholding a discriminatory map. This decision from the Court's far-right bloc proves extremists are willing to rig elections. The Texas map is a discriminatory power grab targeting Black and Latino voters, he stated.